Mickey on my mind

It hasn’t been an easy few days for Devils fans. We’re taking flak from 30 directions, as fans of the other NHL teams and detached reporterly types alike shred our beloved club for failing to score on Jonathan Quick. Some of us have turned on our own, blaming the Devils’ players for choosing not to turn Game 3 into an outtake from Slapshot… and for failing to score on Jonathan Quick. Others contort their minds to manufacture hope, as though the Devils, like Tinkerbell, might be brought back to life if they just clap their hands loudly enough. The rest of us sigh, pray to the hockey gods that New Jersey can take Game 4 so as to avoid the first playoff series sweep in team history, and try to maintain a sense of humor as smug friends – themselves likely fans of one of the teams the Devils defeated en route to the finals – celebrate Jersey’s impending demise.

Against the backdrop of a Twitter feed comprised mainly of pithy verbal jigs on the Devils’ as yet undug grave, I’m here to remind Devils Nation that this isn’t the first time we’ve been at odds with the rest of the NHL fandom. Since the Kings’ presence in the finals has led NBC(SN) to put Wayne Gretzky’s face on screen more than Zach Parise’s, this seems like a good time to think back on the moment when Devils fans began our first major break with the rest of the NHL by learning, and subsequently failing to forget, that Gretzky can be a complete jerk. Which brings us to the Mickey Mouse Incident.

Before you tell me to just get over it, think about how incredibly, egregiously obnoxious Gretzky was that night. Let’s review the quote in question:

“Well, it’s time they got their act together. They’re ruining the whole league. They had better stop running a Mickey Mouse organization and put somebody on the ice.”

No, don’t just glance at it. Go back and read it again. I’ll wait.

Now, let’s put it in context.

Gretzky made that statement about a collection of lazy, underachieving players who deserved a wake-up call, except that of course he didn’t. The ’83-’84 Devils lacked Gretzky’s natural talent, by which I mean the entire team put together did not have as much talent as the superstar who chose to kick sand in their metaphorical face. Presumably, Gretzky was trying to speak to the NHL and/or the Devils’ front office, but what he actually did was lash out at a group of athletes whose only sin was that they were overmatched.

Gretzky was understandably upset after a tough loss when he kicked that sand, except that of course he wasn’t, as his team had just trounced the Devils, 13-4. Wayne himself, in an obvious effort to maintain the dignity of league (as well as that of friend and former teammate Ron Low, who was playing goal for the Devils at the time and on whose behalf Gretzky is believed to have been lashing out), ripped off 3 goals and 5 assists in that game.

Gretzky didn’t realize that his words carried weight, except that of course he did because he was already known as The Great One, had already appeared on the cover of Sports Illustrated, was already the face of the NHL. Imagine how the Devils’ players felt when that guy, that guy, declared to the world that they were so terrible as to be singularly responsible for ruining the league. Our outrage as fans was born of our love and respect for a bunch of guys just trying to stick in the big leagues, to keep living their dreams. It was never about the uniform; it was about the men who wore it, and the viciousness with which this presumed ambassador for the game attacked their very presence in his world. The reason I can’t just ‘get over it’ is that those men meant, and still mean, something precious to me. I was their fan before I was a fan of hockey overall, and to treat them with cruelty is to make an enemy of me and all the other fans whose lives those men brightened.

Granted, Gretzky was just 22 at the time, and heaven knows I don’t want to be judged on some isolated comment I might have made at 22. So I would gladly view Mickeygate as a one-time youthful transgression… had he not reprised his role as schoolyard bully in 2006 by picking on Rory Fitzpatrick for being an unwilling pawn in a fan-generated mission to undermine the holy sanctity of the All-Star Game.

I am in no way disputing Gretzky’s greatness as a player, but somehow his offensive prowess on the ice blinded the majority of the hockey world to his downright mean comments off it. People want him to be the very picture of class, so they constructed his image around that assumption. Devils fans, though, are less likely than anyone (with the possible exception of Rory Fitzpatrick himself) to fall for it. So while most fans will assume that these were the only two blots on an otherwise spotless existence, I believe the evidence I’ve seen that Gretzky is not nearly the saint he’s made out to be. His heart has been in exactly the wrong place – in ways that he opted to share with the world – on at least two occasions. I can’t help but figure that just because I can’t cite more examples of his nastiness doesn’t mean they haven’t happened just out of my earshot.

The requisite disclaimer: I have never met Wayne Gretzky, and my opinion of him is based purely on viewing his actions from afar. And before everyone goes nuts, remember that I’m not calling the guy Hitler. I just don’t worship at the Church of the Great One, and you can’t make me. So there.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Mickey on my mind

  1. I don’t believe that Gretzky is a saint, and, as an Oilers fan, you know that my opinion doesn’t carry much weight on a Devils fan’s rant about the Great One, but my two cents:

    1. You hit the nail on the head. “Presumably, Gretzky was trying to speak to the NHL and/or the Devils’ front office, but what he actually did was lash out at a group of athletes whose only sin was that they were overmatched.”

    When building an NHL team, relying on a bunch of young, inexperienced players to play to the level of other NHL teams, to keep these athletes excited about the game, to encourage fans to attend and fully support a team, and ultimately to make the play-offs, well that IS the duty of the Front Office. It’s like building a town- you need a good mix of new development, medical services, retail outlets, garbage dumps, and policing. In a hockey team, just throwing a bunch of talented athletes together without planning ahead on how they will mesh together on and off the ice, how mentorship will work within the dressing room, how the smaller players will be protected and supported by the goons etc. etc. etc. then you end up building a team that doesn’t play well together. Calling out a team for doing this is what every fan of the game does every season. Why not a hockey player too, who like you pointed out, knew more first hand than the casual fan due to his close relationship with one of the embarrased players?

    2. You point out the age of Gretzky on making these remarks. At this point he had been on a team that was stellar. Not just good, but stellar. His experience and knowledge of hockey was all about playing for the Edmonton Oilers, who at that point, knew how to get a talented bunch of guys to make each other greater, with a front office that knew how to keep those guys playing at the top of their game. He had never faced a losing season, he certainly had no experience of playing for a team like the one he described here. Was that a flaw of youth? Possibly, but it was also a flaw of having no understanding of a realistic NHL franchise in development.

    And I realise the irony of this discussion, being, as mentioned above, an Oilers fan, especially over the last few years. The fact is that other players calling out our organisation, especially after a nasty drubbing would feel very much like a kick in the nuts after a slap to the face, but, again, the frustration of a young player who wants top play top level, competitive hockey every night isn’t just the frustration of a losing player, it’s the frustration of every player on the ice.

    Anyway, as always, I enjoyed your article.

    • I’m not saying the Devils organization didn’t deserve some criticism, but Gretzky delivered it post-game, through reporters, in a way that directly trashed the players. It was a nasty thing to do.

  2. (I am not overly familiar with the Devils of this era, so my response is a vague trail of thoughts based on how I would feel about this type of comment being made about the recent Oilers, and trying to put together a coherant response. Please fell free to school me in response 😉 )

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s